Evaluation on wear resistance of six composite resins and influencing factors in vitro / 吉林大学学报(医学版)

Objective:To investigate the wear resistance of four low-shrinkage commercial composite resins and two traditional composite resins in vitro and discuss the relative influencing factors, and to illustrate the inner relationship of the wear resistance of resins and material composition.Methods:Four low-shrinkage commercial composite resins including CLEARFIL MAJESTY Posterior(CMP), Filtek LS(LS), Admira(AD), Kalore(KA) and two traditional composite resins including Filtek Z350XT (Z350), Solitaire2(S2) were chosen.The bar-shaped specimens were fabricated and mounted in a UMT-2 wear testing machine and abraded with the two-body media (distilled water) with a Si3N4 ball as antagonist.The maximum wear depth was determined after 14 400 cycles.The friction coefficient was determined during the test.The worn surfaces were examined with SEM.Results:CMP showed the lowest maximum wear depth and KA presented the highest maximum wear depth.The maximum wear depth ranked as follows: CMP

Post-curing conversion kinetics as functions of the irradiation time and increment thickness

Objective: This study evaluated the variation of conversion degree (DC) in the 12 hours following initial photoactivation of a low-shrinkage composite resin (Venus Diamond). Material and Methods: The conversion degree was monitored for 12 hours using Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR) F-TIR Spectroscopy. The composite was placed in 1 or 2 mm rings and cured for 10 or 20 seconds with a LED lamp. ATR spectra were acquired from the bottom surface of each sample immediately after the initial photoactivation (P=0), 30 minutes (P=0.5) and 12 hours after photoactivation (P=12) in order to obtain the DC progression during the post-curing period. Interactions between thickness (T), irradiation time (I) and post-curing (P) on the DC were calculated through ANOVA testing. Results: All the first order interactions were statistically significant, with the exception of the T-P interaction. Furthermore, the shift from P=0 to P=0.5 had a statistically higher influence than the shift from P=0.5 to P=12. The post-curing period played a fundamental role in reaching higher DC values with the low-shrinkage composite resin tested in this study. Moreover, both the irradiation time and the composite thickness strongly influenced the DC. Conclusions: Increased irradiation time may be useful in obtaining a high conversion degree (DC) with a low-shrinkage nano-hybrid composite resin, particularly with 2 mm composite layers.

Influência da variação da densidade de potência na contração de polimerização e adaptação marginal de resinas compostas à base de metacrilato e silorano / Influence of the power density variation in shrinkage and marginal adaptation of composite resins based on silorane and methacrylates

Este estudo avaliou quantitativamente a contração de polimerização em função do aumento dos valores de densidade de potência irradiados em compósitos à base de metacrilatos e silorano, e qualitativamente a interface restauradora em relação à abertura de fendas marginais, em função da variação do tipo de substrato dentário. As resinas Filtek Z250 e Filtek P90 foram fotoativadas com 200, 400, 600, 800 e 1000 mW/cm2, em um volume constante de 12 mm3, e os valores de contração aferidos por meio da máquina de ensaios universal. Para análise qualitativa da interface restauradora, preparos cavitários classe V de 2x2x2 mm foram restaurados em incisivos bovinos, fotoativados com os mesmos valores de irradiância, e analisados em microscopia eletrônica de varredura nas interfaces da parede circundante em esmalte, parede circundante em dentina e parede axial. Os resultados quantitativos da contração de polimerização foram analisados pelo teste ANOVA a dois critérios e Tukey (p0,05), enquanto para os dados qualitativos os testes Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis e Miller foram empregados. O aumento progressivo da densidade de potência influenciou diretamente na contração de polimerização dos materiais estudados, não obstante a resina composta à base de silorano ter demonstrado valores significativamente menores. A integridade marginal sofreu influência do subtrato dentário bem como da densidade de potência utilizada, para as duas resinas estudadas.

Shrinkage is a limitation of resin composite, compromising the clinical longevity of the restorative procedure. In an attempt to reduce their harmful effects, researchers have studied monomers with lower values of contraction. As a result, low-shrinkage composites wer developed. This study evaluated quantitatively the shrinkage by a universal testing machine as a function of power density increase based on methacrylates, comparing them with silorane based resin, and qualitatively regarding gap formation between the adhesive interface as function of tooth substrate. Resin Filtek P90 and Filtek Z250 were polymerized with the device Blue Star 3 with 200, 400, 600, 800 and 1000 mW/cm2 keeping volume constant in 12 mm3. For qualitative analysis of restorative interface, class V cavity preparations in bovine incisors were restored in (2x2x2 mm), photoactivated with the same values of irradiance, and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy at the interface of the wall surrounding enamel, dentin and axial. The quantitative results of the polymerization shrinkage were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p0,05), while qualitative data for the Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis and Miller were employed. The progressive increase in power density directly influenced the polymerization shrinkage of the materials studied, despite the silorane based resin have demonstrated significantly lower values. The marginal integrity was influenced by the dental substrate and the power density used.

Microfiltración en cavidades clase II restauradas con resinas compuestas de baja contracción

El objetivo: El propósito de esta investigación es comparar la capacidad de sellando marginal en el margen gingival de tres sistemas de resina compuesta en premolares humanos. Los tres sistemas usados fueron: Resina Grupo 1 ORMOCERAMICA (Admira Bond, Admira Flow A2, Admira A2 - Voco), Resina Grupo 2 NANOHIBRIDA (Solobond M, Grandio Flow A2, Grandio A2 - Voco), Resina Grupo 3 HIBRIDA (Excite, Tetric Flow A2, el Tetric Ceram A2 - Ivoclar / Vivadent). Materiales y Métodos: se prepararon 30 premolares humanos con dos cavidades clase II y asignados al azar en tres grupos (G1, G2, y G3) con 20 restauraciones para cada grupo, se realizaron las restauraciones siguiendo las instrucciones de la casa fabricante. Después de restaurados las muestras se termociclaron (500 ciclos entre 5-55°C) y se almacenaron en agua durante 90 días. Luego se sumergieron en una solución de 50% de nitrato de plata durante dos horas, se fijaron, se seccionaron y se analizaron con imágenes digitales. La prueba no paramétrica (Kruskal-Wallis) fue usada para observar las diferencias estadísticas. Resultados: Se observaron diferencias significativas en la microfiltración (p = 0,002) entre los materiales restaurativos usados. Los sistemas quedaron ordenados de la siguiente manera 20.98 G3, 31.65 G1, y 38.88 G2. Conclusión: Bajo las condiciones en las que se realizo este estudio, los bajos valores de contracción de polimerización reportados para ORMOCERAMICA G1 (1,97vol%) o NANOHIBRIDA G2 (1,57vol%) no muestran mayor capacidad de sellar los márgenes gingivales de restauraciones clase II después del termociclado y el almacenamiento en agua por 90 días, cuando se compararon con una resina compuesta de contracción convencional G3 HÍBRIDA (2,32vol%).

Objective: The purpose of this research was to compare the sealing capability of three all-composite system Class II (human premolars) restorations at the gingival margin. The three systems used were: group 1 ORMOCER (Admira Bond, Admira Flow A2, Admira A2 -Voco), group 2 NANOHYBRID (Solobond M, Grandio FlowA2, GrandioA2 - Voco), group 3 HYBRID (Excite, Tetric Flow A2, Tetric Ceram A2 - Ivoclar /Vivadent). Methods and Materials: 30 human premolars were prepared with 2 single classes II and randomly assigned to three groups (G1, G2, and G3) with 20 restorations for each one following the manufacturer's instructions. After restored, samples were thermocycled (500 cycles between 5-55◦C) and stored in water for 90 days. Then, they were immersed in a 50% of Ag ion solution for two hours, sectioned and analyzed by digital imaging. No-parametric test (Kruskal-Wallis) was used to detect statistical differences. Results: Significant differences in microleakage were observed (p = 0,002) among the restorative materials used. Respect to the manufacturer's system the mean ranks were 20.98 G3, 31.65 G1, and 38.88 G2. Conclusion: Under the conditions of this study, the reduced polymerization shrinkages reported for ORMOCER G1 (1,97vol %) or NANOHYBRID G2 (1,57vol %) don't show better capacity of sealing in gingival margins of class II after thermo - cycling and water storage when compared to HYBRID G3 (2,32vol %).